On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 4/8/15 7:04 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> I'm thinking to apply the attached patch.
>> But does anyone want to keep supporting the option? Why?
>
>
> Nuke it.
There seem no objections, so just pushed.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
--
Sent via
On 4/8/15 7:04 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
I'm thinking to apply the attached patch.
But does anyone want to keep supporting the option? Why?
Nuke it.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing lis
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:17 PM, FabrÃzio de Royes Mello
wrote:
>
>
> Em quarta-feira, 8 de abril de 2015, Fujii Masao
> escreveu:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While reviewing the REINDEX VERBOSE patch, I felt inclined to remove FORCE
>> option support from REINDEX command. It has been marked "obsolete" since
Em quarta-feira, 8 de abril de 2015, Fujii Masao
escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> While reviewing the REINDEX VERBOSE patch, I felt inclined to remove FORCE
> option support from REINDEX command. It has been marked "obsolete" since
> very old version 7.4. I think that it's no longer worth keeping supporting
>
Hi,
While reviewing the REINDEX VERBOSE patch, I felt inclined to remove FORCE
option support from REINDEX command. It has been marked "obsolete" since
very old version 7.4. I think that it's no longer worth keeping supporting it.
Thought?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers ma
