>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:34 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This release represents a major leap forward for PostgreSQL by adding
> significant new functionality and performance enhancements. This was
> made possible by a growing community that
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:34:14 -0400 (EDT)
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > > > PostgreSQL. Many complex ideas that normally take years
> > > > to implement were added rapidly to this release by our development team.
> > >
> > > You
Kevin Grittner wrote:
How exactly do you expect the software to get from a .0 to a .1 release,
or to have addressed the bugs that might bite you when it does get to .1,
if you aren't helping to test it?
In most environments I've seen, developer and QA systems don't hesitate
to move to .0
>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:37 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ron Mayer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> With respect to you Kevin, your managers should wait. You don't
>>> install .0 releases of "any" software into productio
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> With respect to you Kevin, your managers should wait. You don't
>> install .0 releases of "any" software into production without "months"
>> of testing. At which point, normally a .1 release has come out anyway.
>
> How exactly do
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:51:13AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > >> If the goal is to provide fair warning of a high-than-usual-risk
> > >> release, you've got it covered.
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >> If the goal is to provide fair warning of a high-than-usual-risk
> >> release, you've got it covered.
>
> > No, that was not the intent. The indent was to say we got a lot
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:31:20 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > With respect to you Kevin, your managers should wait. You don't
>
> Now I realize that you did say "test" above, but way too often I see
> this sort of argument as a justifi
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With respect to you Kevin, your managers should wait. You don't
> install .0 releases of "any" software into production without "months"
> of testing. At which point, normally a .1 release has come out anyway.
How exactly do you expect the software t
On Oct 11, 2007, at 18:51 , Joshua D. Drake wrote:
With respect to you Kevin, your managers should wait. You don't
install .0 releases of "any" software into production without "months"
of testing. At which point, normally a .1 release has come out anyway.
At the same time, an open source pro
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:26:43 -0500
"Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant
> > new functionality and performance enhancements to
> > PostgreSQL. Many complex ideas that normally take
> > years to implement were added rapidl
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 3:34 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The indent was to say we got a lot done in
> one year. You have a suggestion?
My suggestion would be to stay away from statements about the speed
of development and focus on the user
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> If the goal is to provide fair warning of a high-than-usual-risk
>> release, you've got it covered.
> No, that was not the intent. The indent was to say we got a lot done in
> one year. You have a suggestion?
Yeah: take the ent
On 10/11/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 3:04 PM, in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant new
> > > functionali
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 16:04 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have added the following introductory paragraph to the release notes:
>
> This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant new
> functionality and performance enhancements to
> PostgreSQL. Many complex
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:34:14 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > > PostgreSQL. Many complex ideas that normally take years
> > > to implement were added rapidly to this release by our development team.
> >
> > You do realize that this will make many ma
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 3:04 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant new
> > functionality and performance enhancements to
> > PostgreSQL. Many complex idea
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 3:04 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant new
> functionality and performance enhancements to
> PostgreSQL. Many complex ideas that normally take years
> to im
[ BCC to docs and hackers. Sorry this seems like the only logical way
to do this.]
I have added the following introductory paragraph to the release notes:
This release represents a major leap forward by adding significant new
functionality and performance enhancements to
19 matches
Mail list logo
