Re: [HACKERS] Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k

2004-12-25 Thread Rémi Zara
Le 23 déc. 04, à 16:09, Tom Lane a écrit : "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Now we just need to work out why the box is failing the oldstyle_length test - see http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=osprey&dt=2004-12 -23%2005:00:22 Either the passing of arguments or the pas

Re: [HACKERS] Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k

2004-12-23 Thread Tom Lane
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now we just need to work out why the box is failing the oldstyle_length test > - see > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=osprey&dt=2004-12-23%2005:00:22 Either the passing of arguments or the passing of the return value isn't working t

Re: [HACKERS] Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k

2004-12-23 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Rémi Zara said: >> >>> From pgbuildfarm, it seems that openBSD sparc64 does not exhibit the >>> problem (it's not part of resultmap, and passes the float8 test). >> >> OK, never mind that then. Patch applied as-is. > > Cool, thanks ! > Now we just need to work out why the box is failing the old

Re: [HACKERS] Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k

2004-12-22 Thread Rémi Zara
Le 23 déc. 04, à 04:52, Tom Lane a écrit : =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Le 23 d=E9c. 04, =E0 00:26, Tom Lane a =E9crit : Looks reasonable to me --- why do you call it only a "semi" fix Because strtod really should underflow, so there seems to be a bug in NetBSD's strtod

Re: [HACKERS] Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k

2004-12-22 Thread Tom Lane
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le 23 d=E9c. 04, =E0 00:26, Tom Lane a =E9crit : >> Looks reasonable to me --- why do you call it only a "semi" fix > Because strtod really should underflow, so there seems to be a bug in > NetBSD's strtod. > So this is just accepting the

Re: [HACKERS] Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k

2004-12-22 Thread Rémi Zara
Le 23 déc. 04, à 00:26, Tom Lane a écrit : =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: --- src/test/regress/resultmap.orig 2004-10-04 16:42:47.0=20 +0200 +++ src/test/regress/resultmap 2004-12-22 23:27:51.0 +0100 @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ float8/i.86-.*-freebsd[234]=float

Re: [HACKERS] Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k

2004-12-22 Thread Tom Lane
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- src/test/regress/resultmap.orig 2004-10-04 16:42:47.0=20 > +0200 > +++ src/test/regress/resultmap 2004-12-22 23:27:51.0 +0100 > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > float8/i.86-.*-freebsd[234]=float8-small-is-zero > float8/i.86-.*

[HACKERS] Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k

2004-12-22 Thread Rémi Zara
Hi, One of the regression failure on NetBSD mac68k is float8 (see http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=osprey&br=HEAD). The failure is due to the fact the strtod does not underflow for +-10e-400. I see in src/test/regress/resultmap that NetBSD ix86 does not overflow either, and