Re: [HACKERS] Recursive unions

2003-01-29 Thread Tom Lane
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane kirjutas K, 29.01.2003 kell 17:58: >> It'll be looked at; whether it will be done in time for 7.4 is anyone's guess. > Is anyone actually working on it ? I don't think any significant work has been done yet. If you wanted to update your existi

Re: [HACKERS] Recursive unions

2003-01-29 Thread Hannu Krosing
Tom Lane kirjutas K, 29.01.2003 kell 17:58: > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What was the result of the recursive unions thread? I remember Tom maybe > > saying that the Redhat guys like the DB2 (SQL99) syntax the best, however > > was it said that that was going to be d

Re: [HACKERS] Recursive unions

2003-01-29 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What was the result of the recursive unions thread? I remember Tom maybe > saying that the Redhat guys like the DB2 (SQL99) syntax the best, however > was it said that that was going to be done by Redhat for 7.4? It'll be looked at; whether

[HACKERS] Recursive unions

2003-01-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hi guys, What was the result of the recursive unions thread? I remember Tom maybe saying that the Redhat guys like the DB2 (SQL99) syntax the best, however was it said that that was going to be done by Redhat for 7.4? Chris ---(end of broadcast)-