Re: [HACKERS] Recently noticed documentation issues

2012-08-24 Thread Amit Kapila
From: Craig Ringer [mailto:ring...@ringerc.id.au] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 6:59 PM On 08/24/2012 12:42 PM, Amit Kapila wrote: >> Isn't what you are telling explained in Returning Cursors section on below >> link: >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/plpgsql-cursors.html >Yes, but no

Re: [HACKERS] Recently noticed documentation issues

2012-08-24 Thread Craig Ringer
On 08/24/2012 12:42 PM, Amit Kapila wrote: Isn't what you are telling explained in Returning Cursors section on below link: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/plpgsql-cursors.html Yes, but nowhere in: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-fetch.html and IMO not clearly e

Re: [HACKERS] Recently noticed documentation issues

2012-08-23 Thread Amit Kapila
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Craig Ringer Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 7:17 AM > I've recently noticed two oversights in the docs that I'd like to fix. > First, in sql-fetch, there's no hint that the cursor name can be the >

[HACKERS] Recently noticed documentation issues

2012-08-23 Thread Craig Ringer
Hi all I've recently noticed two oversights in the docs that I'd like to fix. First, in sql-fetch, there's no hint that the cursor name can be the quoted value of a refcursor, eg: FETCH ALL FROM ""; This *is* shown in an example in plpgsql-cursors, but only in some sample code. If you