On 18 June 2010 09:31, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
> 2010/6/17 Greg Stark :
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I actually wonder if we shouldn't automatically tag plpgsql functions
> >>> with the search_path in effect at the time of their creation (as if
> >>> the user ha
2010/6/17 Greg Stark :
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I actually wonder if we shouldn't automatically tag plpgsql functions
>>> with the search_path in effect at the time of their creation (as if
>>> the user had done ALTER FUNCTION ... SET search_path=...whatever the
>>> c
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I actually wonder if we shouldn't automatically tag plpgsql functions
>> with the search_path in effect at the time of their creation (as if
>> the user had done ALTER FUNCTION ... SET search_path=...whatever the
>> current search path is...).
>
