On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Ah, the build has been failing for at least the last few days due to
> small problems in new content. Since I receive ~700 logs of doc builds
> each year (well, that is the annual rate but I've only stepped up to
> twice daily since ~April), I get slo
> [Not to list]
Back on list; thanks though for protecting me from ridicule ;)
> >For developers (-hackers developers, not application developers using
> >the current release), the "current docs" correspond to the docs built
> >nightly (actually twice a day), which reflect the current developmen
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 11:13 19/10/00 -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> >I thought /docs/index.html was to be for the current docs. Since they're
> >not, what ARE they pointing to?? Anyway, I've now got it pointing to
> >devel-contrib/docs/index.html and created an in
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> >
> > > > > I don't see a reference from the developer's corner web page, which
> > > > > seems to point back to the released version instead.
> > > > That's strange... I s
At 11:13 19/10/00 -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
>I thought /docs/index.html was to be for the current docs. Since they're
>not, what ARE they pointing to?? Anyway, I've now got it pointing to
>devel-contrib/docs/index.html and created an index. If you ever need to
>update the index, look at
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > > > I don't see a reference from the developer's corner web page, which
> > > > seems to point back to the released version instead.
> > > That's strange... I see it :) ...now
> >
> > Great! But I don't, maybe due
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > I don't see a reference from the developer's corner web page, which
> > > seems to point back to the released version instead.
> > That's strange... I see it :) ...now
>
> Great! But I don't, maybe due to caching somewhere? Should I be seei
> > I don't see a reference from the developer's corner web page, which
> > seems to point back to the released version instead.
> That's strange... I see it :) ...now
Great! But I don't, maybe due to caching somewhere? Should I be seeing
http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/
-> C
> > Should be twice a day.
> Where is this auto-updated copy hiding? The bookmark I have,
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/index.html
> is pointing at files that haven't updated for months...
Right. Last updated at the last release.
The developer's versions from the current tre
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > Should be twice a day.
> > Where is this auto-updated copy hiding? The bookmark I have,
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/index.html
> > is pointing at files that haven't updated for months...
>
> Right. Last updated at the las
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Done. Do you know often the web-based version of the documentation get
>> updated?
> Should be twice a day.
Where is this auto-updated copy hiding? The bookmark I have,
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/index.html
is pointing at files
> Done. Do you know often the web-based version of the documentation get
> updated?
Should be twice a day. afaik you can go to hub.org:~thomas/CURRENT and
run ./docbuild. Make sure your umask is set to 2 (so I can update files
after that) and you may want to detach the command and log it to a fil
12 matches
Mail list logo
