Tom Lane wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Colin 't Hart wrote:
5. I think Bugzilla's concepts of products, components and versions fitthe way we work.I envisage that 'Postgres', 'Interfaces', 'Languages' might be prod
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> Everybody keeps saying bugzilla. What EXACTLY will bugzilla do for us
> that would make me want to learn it and install it? BTW, the current
> wheel was invented a year ago 'cuze nothing really fit what we needed.
I believe the greatest advantage for the PostgreSQL is
Tom Lane wrote:
> it does seem like a lot of people
> like Bugzilla. Might be worth at least a cursory look.
We do use Bugzilla and I believe is a very good tool, which should fit
nicely with the open development style of PostgreSQL community. New
version is due in a few weeks and it's been alr
Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Colin 't Hart wrote:
>> 5. I think Bugzilla's concepts of products, components and versions fit
>> the way we work.
>> I envisage that 'Postgres', 'Interfaces', 'Languages' might be products
>> that we would have.
>> Within 'Postgr
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Colin 't Hart wrote:
> Vince asks:
>
> > Everybody keeps saying bugzilla. What EXACTLY will bugzilla do for us
> > that would make me want to learn it and install it? BTW, the current
> > wheel was invented a year ago 'cuze nothing really fit what we needed.
>
> The reasons
Vince asks:
> Everybody keeps saying bugzilla. What EXACTLY will bugzilla do for us
> that would make me want to learn it and install it? BTW, the current
> wheel was invented a year ago 'cuze nothing really fit what we needed.
The reasons I would choose Bugzilla:
1. It's *not* written by us
