>
> Well if stuff like that ends up in Postgresql would it be possible to index
> LIKE '%xxx%' searches? That way all people have to do is create the
> relevant index and use a fts_ops or something, and voila LIKE '%xxx%'
> searches become faster, with maybe some performance+disk space hit for
>
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> It *is* alot quicker. I did a search for "scrappy" on All Lists and
> it came back in 0.151 secs. But it only found 104 matches, have you
> been that quiet Marc?
I got 3604 messages for the period from 1995 to now.
