On Friday 20 July 2001 19:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How is this search path defined? Blindly using libdir is not ok --
> Why not?
During RPM build, libdir will point to /usr/lib. This is OK and appropriate
for the generally-loadable shared libs. HOWEVER
> > On to the next batch There are a few perl and python scripts shipped as
> > examples -- every last one of them shebangs to '/usr/local/perl' or
> > '/usr/local/python' -- to make them usable, I patch this to '/usr/bin/perl'
> > or python, as appropriate.
> Hmm. Given that they're only ex
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How is this search path defined? Blindly using libdir is not ok --
Why not?
The search path is defined in postgresql.conf (and I see Peter forgot
to add an example to the postgresql.conf.sample file), but the default
is the backend-compile-time $libdir.
On Friday 20 July 2001 18:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On to the next batch There are a few perl and python scripts shipped
> > as examples -- every last one of them shebangs to '/usr/local/perl' or
> > '/usr/local/python' -- to make them usable, I patch th
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 07:05:46PM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsr?d wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > BTW, the only python shebangs I can find in CVS look like
> > #! /usr/bin/env python
> > Isn't that OK on RedHat?
>
> It is.
Probably the perl scripts should say, likewise,
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, the only python shebangs I can find in CVS look like
> #! /usr/bin/env python
> Isn't that OK on RedHat?
It is.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you che
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, let's look. First, there is a createlang issue: during build, @libdir@
> as referenced in the createlang script references /usr/lib, instead of
> /usr/lib/pgsql, which is desired.
Okay, that problem is gone in current sources, anyway (createlang no
[cc: to GENERAL replacedby cc: to HACKERS]
On Friday 20 July 2001 17:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The biggest patching by far is
> > in the regression tests, which really are not designed to live outside
> > the source tree, but can be munged into shape fairly e