Re: [HACKERS] Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)

2001-07-21 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday 20 July 2001 19:56, Tom Lane wrote: > Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How is this search path defined? Blindly using libdir is not ok -- > Why not? During RPM build, libdir will point to /usr/lib. This is OK and appropriate for the generally-loadable shared libs. HOWEVER

[HACKERS] Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)

2001-07-20 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> > On to the next batch There are a few perl and python scripts shipped as > > examples -- every last one of them shebangs to '/usr/local/perl' or > > '/usr/local/python' -- to make them usable, I patch this to '/usr/bin/perl' > > or python, as appropriate. > Hmm. Given that they're only ex

Re: [HACKERS] Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)

2001-07-20 Thread Tom Lane
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How is this search path defined? Blindly using libdir is not ok -- Why not? The search path is defined in postgresql.conf (and I see Peter forgot to add an example to the postgresql.conf.sample file), but the default is the backend-compile-time $libdir.

Re: [HACKERS] Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)

2001-07-20 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday 20 July 2001 18:45, Tom Lane wrote: > Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On to the next batch There are a few perl and python scripts shipped > > as examples -- every last one of them shebangs to '/usr/local/perl' or > > '/usr/local/python' -- to make them usable, I patch th

Re: [HACKERS] Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)

2001-07-20 Thread Nathan Myers
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 07:05:46PM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsr?d wrote: > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > BTW, the only python shebangs I can find in CVS look like > > #! /usr/bin/env python > > Isn't that OK on RedHat? > > It is. Probably the perl scripts should say, likewise,

Re: [HACKERS] Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)

2001-07-20 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, the only python shebangs I can find in CVS look like > #! /usr/bin/env python > Isn't that OK on RedHat? It is. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you che

[HACKERS] Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)

2001-07-20 Thread Tom Lane
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, let's look. First, there is a createlang issue: during build, @libdir@ > as referenced in the createlang script references /usr/lib, instead of > /usr/lib/pgsql, which is desired. Okay, that problem is gone in current sources, anyway (createlang no

[HACKERS] Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)

2001-07-20 Thread Lamar Owen
[cc: to GENERAL replacedby cc: to HACKERS] On Friday 20 July 2001 17:14, Tom Lane wrote: > Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The biggest patching by far is > > in the regression tests, which really are not designed to live outside > > the source tree, but can be munged into shape fairly e