Re: [HACKERS] Re: Possible explanation for readline configuration problems

2001-04-14 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (b) the readline dudes commented out (#if 0) the declaration of > filename_completion_function in the header in favour of the new > rl_filename_completion_function (but left the symbol in the library). The "#if 0" silliness is not what's confusing co

[HACKERS] Re: Possible explanation for readline configuration problems

2001-04-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > We've gotten several different reports lately of peculiar compilation > errors and warnings involving readline in 7.1. They look like configure > is actively doing the wrong thing --- for example, how could we see > reports like this: > > tab-complete.c:734: `filename_completi

[HACKERS] Re: Possible explanation for readline configuration problems

2001-04-13 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > ... how could we see reports like this: > tab-complete.c:734: `filename_completion_function' undeclared (first use in this >function) > when the code makes a point of providing a declaration for > filename_completion_function if configure didn't see it in the headers? Never mind ...