On Monday 16 October 2000 20:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Hollomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I say let them drop it with either one.
> >>
> >> I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop
> >> table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are
> >>
> > > > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW'
> > > > or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed?
> > >
> > > I say let them drop it with either one.
> >
> > I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop
> > table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings
Mark Hollomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I say let them drop it with either one.
>>
>> I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop
>> table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are
>> pretty sure you haven't 'oopsed' in the process :)
> So th
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:41:43PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > "Hollomon, Mark" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do we still want to be able to inherit from views?
> > >
> > > Also:
> > >
> > > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > "Hollomon, Mark" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do we still want to be able to inherit from views?
> > >
> > > Also:
> > >
> > > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW'
> > > or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed?
> >
> > I say let
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > "Hollomon, Mark" wrote:
> > >
> > > Do we still want to be able to inherit from views?
> >
> > Also:
> >
> > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW'
> > or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed?
>
> I say let them drop it with eithe
> "Hollomon, Mark" wrote:
> >
> > Do we still want to be able to inherit from views?
>
> Also:
>
> Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW'
> or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed?
I say let them drop it with either one.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://c
