On Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:10:12 -0700, Nathan Myers alluded:
> I saw three separate reports of successful builds on Linux 2.4.2 on x86
> (including mine), but it isn't listed here.
[jeff@cairhien pronto]$ /var/postgresql/bin/psql -V
psql (PostgreSQL) 7.1RC1
contains history support
..
[jeff@ca
On Wednesday 04 April 2001 13:29, Pete Forman wrote:
> > Solaris 2.7-8 Sparc7.1 2001-03-22, Marc Fournier
>
> I've reported Solaris 2.6 Sparc as working on a post-RC1 snapshot.
Same for Solaris 8 Sparc, but only tested with RC1.
--
El mejor sistema operativo es aquel que te da de comer.
Cu
> You could ask. Just to ignore reports that you have asked for is not
> polite. My report was based on a virgin, unpatched 2.4.2 kernel, and
> (as noted) the Debian-packaged glibc-2.2.2.
The simple fact is that the vast majority of Linux boxes are not yet
running 2.4 kernels, so imho it is not
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Nathan Myers wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:19:04PM +, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > I saw three separate reports of successful builds on Linux 2.4.2 on x86
> > > (including mine), but it isn't listed here.
> >
> > It is listed in the comments in the real docs. At leas
> Solaris 2.7-8 Sparc7.1 2001-03-22, Marc Fournier
I've reported Solaris 2.6 Sparc as working on a post-RC1 snapshot.
--
Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated
WesternGeco -./\.- by myself and does not represent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -./\.-
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:19:04PM +, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > I saw three separate reports of successful builds on Linux 2.4.2 on x86
> > (including mine), but it isn't listed here.
>
> It is listed in the comments in the real docs. At least one report was
> for an extensively patched 2.4.
> I saw three separate reports of successful builds on Linux 2.4.2 on x86
> (including mine), but it isn't listed here.
It is listed in the comments in the real docs. At least one report was
for an extensively patched 2.4.2, and I'm not sure of the true lineage
of the others.
I *could* remove th
