Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-21 Thread bpalmer
$ uname -a OpenBSD mizer 2.8 a#0 i386 P3, default 2.8 install. Problems w/ TCL, but I think it's a local problem. System needs kernel changes as noted at www.crimelabs.net. (shared mem stuff). OBSD-sparc comming soon. - b b. palmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp: www.crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-21 Thread Jim Buttafuoco
HPUX 9.07 with GCC 2.8.1 fails the regression tests. I will look into this later. I would NOT hold anything up because of this Jim > Time to speak up, I have a HPUX 9.07 system and will test today. > > Jim > > > Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-21 Thread Jim Buttafuoco
Time to speak up, I have a HPUX 9.07 system and will test today. Jim > Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture) > > > Time to drop 9.2 from the list? > > I don't have it running here anymore. Is there anyone on the list > who can test on HPUX 9? >

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tatsuo Ishii writes: > > > Tatsuo, I have a separate listing for "mklinux" for the 7.0 release. Is > > > that distro still valid and unique? Or is there a better way to > > > represent the PPC options under Linux? > > > > mklinux is older Motorola 68k-based systems > > No. MkLinux runs on Power P

[HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Thomas Lockhart writes: > > HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture) > > Time to drop 9.2 from the list? > > > Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... Given that we list "x86", I think we wouldn't care. -- Peter

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-21 Thread Giles Lean
> Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture) > > > Time to drop 9.2 from the list? > > I don't have it running here anymore. Is there anyone on the list > who can test on HPUX 9? HP haven't supported 9.X since the end of 1999 on servers, and since ea

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-20 Thread Dominic J. Eidson
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > > >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) > > > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... > > > It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is > > > inside (and Apple's spec sheet i

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-20 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> > Tatsuo, I have a separate listing for "mklinux" for the 7.0 release. Is > > that distro still valid and unique? Or is there a better way to > > represent the PPC options under Linux? > > mklinux is older Motorola 68k-based systems No. MkLinux runs on Power PC based system also. I believe the

[HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-20 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> Tatsuo, I have a separate listing for "mklinux" for the 7.0 release. Is > that distro still valid and unique? Or is there a better way to > represent the PPC options under Linux? I think MkLinux is completely different from Linux/PPC. Will test RC1 on my MkLiux box soon... -- Tatsuo Ishii

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-20 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> mklinux is older Motorola 68k-based systems > LinuxPPC is the newer powerPC-based systems Hmm. I have mklinux listed as being on the 750. My vague recollection is that the distinction is between NuBus and PCI machines (not necessarily in that order), but... I also vaguely recalled that the dis

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-20 Thread Dominic J. Eidson
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > > >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) > > > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... > > > It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is > > > inside (and Apple's spec sheet i

[HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-20 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> > >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) > > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... > > It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is > > inside (and Apple's spec sheet isn't too helpful)... > From what I can tell (which is

[HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-20 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) > > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... > It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is > inside (and Apple's spec sheet isn't too helpful)... >From what I can tell (which isn't m

[HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-20 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture) > Time to drop 9.2 from the list? I don't have it running here anymore. Is there anyone on the list who can test on HPUX 9? >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) > Wha

[HACKERS] Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...

2001-03-20 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture) Time to drop 9.2 from the list? > Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... - Thomas ---(end of broadcast)---