Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Next question is do we want to change it? I can't imagine any real good
>> use for a null-string name, but is there any risk of breaking existing
>> applications?
> I think the larger risk is breaking applications if we leave it
Tom Lane writes:
> Next question is do we want to change it? I can't imagine any real good
> use for a null-string name, but is there any risk of breaking existing
> applications?
I think the larger risk is breaking applications if we leave it this way.
One such broken application is the form
