Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta6 for Tomorrow

2001-03-18 Thread Nat Howard
Peter, I'll give it a try, and send the stuff to you directly, so you can say something like "that isn't what I meant!". >Nat Howard writes: > >> Not sure if this counts as *major*, but this jdbc1 compile >> problem is presumably still there: >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta6 for Tomorrow

2001-03-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Nat Howard writes: > Not sure if this counts as *major*, but this jdbc1 compile > problem is presumably still there: > > http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-03/msg3.html > > as the referenced source file hasn't been updated. If I recall > right, Peter was waiting for a java 1 S

[HACKERS] Re: Beta6 for Tomorrow

2001-03-18 Thread Nat Howard
Not sure if this counts as *major*, but this jdbc1 compile problem is presumably still there: http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-03/msg3.html as the referenced source file hasn't been updated. If I recall right, Peter was waiting for a java 1 SDK to be installed. ---