RE: [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 vacuum

2001-04-27 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> What's the deal with vacuum lazy in 7.1? I was looking > forward to it. It was never clear whether or not you guys > decided to put it in. > > If it is in as a feature, how does one use it? > If it is a patch, how does one get it? > If it is neither a patch nor an existing feature, has > develo

Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 vacuum

2001-04-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
> > What's the deal with vacuum lazy in 7.1? I was looking forward to it. It was > > never clear whether or not you guys decided to put it in. > > > > If it is in as a feature, how does one use it? > > If it is a patch, how does one get it? > > If you actually download and read the enclosed READ

[HACKERS] Re: 7.1 vacuum

2001-04-27 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010427 05:50] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > * Magnus Naeslund(f) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:17] wrote: > > > How does 7.1 work now with the vacuum and all? > > > > > > Does it go for indexes by default, even when i haven't run a vacuum at all? > > > Does

[HACKERS] Re: 7.1 vacuum

2001-04-27 Thread mlw
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Magnus Naeslund(f) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:17] wrote: > > How does 7.1 work now with the vacuum and all? > > > > Does it go for indexes by default, even when i haven't run a vacuum at all? > > Does vacuum lock up postgres? It says the analyze part shouldn't, b