> That would probably be good, yes :-)
>
> You shuold then change:
> mv privkey.pem cert.pem.pw
> openssl rsa -in cert.pem.pw -out cert.pem
>
> to
> openssl rsa -in privkey.pem -out cert.pem
>
> (Sorry, don't have access to the SGML source now, so I can't give you a
> patch)
OK, the SGML diff
Needs fixing - no. The current version *works*.
The fix would remove one unnecessary step from it, but it still *works* in
it's current state.
Sorry about this - I've missed looking at it.
//Magnus
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: den 24 janu
Again, is this something that needs fixing? Just a YES or NO is all I
need.
> It looks Ok, but it has one unnecessary step. There is no need to do the "mv
> privkey.pem cert.pem.pw" if you just use "privkey.pem" in the following
> openssl command (e.g. openssl rsa -in privkey.pem -out cert.pe
But shouldn't we remove it to make it clearer?
> Needs fixing - no. The current version *works*.
> The fix would remove one unnecessary step from it, but it still *works* in
> it's current state.
>
> Sorry about this - I've missed looking at it.
>
> //Magnus
>
> > -Original Message-
>
That would probably be good, yes :-)
You shuold then change:
mv privkey.pem cert.pem.pw
openssl rsa -in cert.pem.pw -out cert.pem
to
openssl rsa -in privkey.pem -out cert.pem
(Sorry, don't have access to the SGML source now, so I can't give you a
patch)
//Magnus
> -Original Message-
>
