Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch to include PAM support...

2001-08-24 Thread Tom Lane
"Dominic J. Eidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Could we change the PAM code so that it tries to run the PAM auth cycle >> immediately on receipt of a connection request? If it gets a callback >> for a password, it abandons the PAM conversation, sends off a password >> request packet, and then

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch to include PAM support...

2001-08-24 Thread Dominic J. Eidson
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > "Dominic J. Eidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Could we change the PAM code so that it tries to run the PAM auth cycle > >> immediately on receipt of a connection request? If it gets a callback > >> for a password, it abandons the PAM conversation, se