RE: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects

2000-10-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
> > Idea: As we have this type of query in more than one part > of the source tree > > (ie: psql, jdbc, probably odbc), should we have a section in the > > documentation containing common queries, like: retrieving a > list of tables, > > views etc? > > That's a good thought. It'd be a useful

[HACKERS] RE: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects

2000-10-24 Thread Peter Mount
Yes, the joins were one of the reasons I was going to do it. If no one starts a list by Saturday, then I'll start one when I go through JDBC. Peter -- Peter Mount Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk All views expressed

[HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects

2000-10-24 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Idea: As we have this type of query in more than one part of the source tree > (ie: psql, jdbc, probably odbc), should we have a section in the > documentation containing common queries, like: retrieving a list of tables, > views etc? That's a good though