Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the pg_stat_activity view call a SRF

2008-08-19 Thread Jaime Casanova
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:56 PM, David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> If this isn't critical, and no one is working on it yet, I can see about >> whittling away at it for 8.4. > i'm doing it... > Looks like there are just 5 of these: > > pg_catalog | pg_cursor | SETOF recor

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the pg_stat_activity view call a SRF

2008-08-19 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:03:04PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > On Monday 18 August 2008 10:53:51 Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > >> Thanks, and while I approve of that TODO, that's not actually the one > > > >> I was talking about in the email. The one I was talking about was > > >

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the pg_stat_activity view call a SRF

2008-08-19 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 18 August 2008 10:53:51 Bruce Momjian wrote: >> TODO updated: >> * Fix all set-returning system functions so they support a wildcard >> target list > If this isn't critical, and no one is working on it yet, I can see about > whittling away at i

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the pg_stat_activity view call a SRF

2008-08-19 Thread Robert Treat
On Monday 18 August 2008 10:53:51 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Thanks, and while I approve of that TODO, that's not actually the one > > >> I was talking about in the email. The one I was talking about was > > >> "change builtin set-returning functions to use OUT parameters so you

[HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the pg_stat_activity view call a SRF

2008-08-18 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > >> Thanks, and while I approve of that TODO, that's not actually the one I > >> was talking about in the email. The one I was talking about was "change > >> builtin set-returning functions to use OUT parameters so you can query > >> them without knowing the result format" or somet