[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress

2010-10-14 Thread David Newall
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: You seem to be answering to an email that I didn't see and couldn't find in the archive either. Was it send in private or to the list? If it went to the list I might be lagging behind. On 14/10/10 22:51, Robert Haas wrote: I didn't g

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress

2010-10-14 Thread Michael Meskes
Am 14.10.2010 08:52, schrieb David Newall: On 14/10/10 12:14, Itagaki Takahiro wrote: Which solution is better? Or, another idea? This does seem to be an new bug in previously working code. While any solution that fixes the problem is good, it might pay to look the code that worked before. As

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress

2010-10-14 Thread David Newall
On 14/10/10 12:14, Itagaki Takahiro wrote: Which solution is better? Or, another idea? This does seem to be an new bug in previously working code. While any solution that fixes the problem is good, it might pay to look the code that worked before. As reported, it worked for ecpg (Postgr