See here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg00438.php
I don't mind requiring 5.6, but I do want to think carefully about the
implications of changing the declaration of $_TD from "my" to "our",
especially if multiple triggers fire. Is there a danger we might clobber
one
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> This was raised before, but I can't find the exact thread. I'd
> like to re-open the idea of boosting the minimum Perl version
> for PL/Perl to 5.6.
I don't think this is unreasonable.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This was raised before, but I can't find the exact thread. I'd
like to re-open the idea of boosting the minimum Perl version
for PL/Perl to 5.6. My primary motivation is to provide use
of "our" for the %TD hash, as mentioned before (cannot find the
e
