Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RULE regression test failure
>
>
>
> OK, patch attached that adds ORDER BY to the problem regression query.
>
> --
> -
>
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > That
OK, patch attached that adds ORDER BY to the problem regression query.
---
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > That seems substantially the same plan as I see here. I guess
> > that the different output order must reflect a
> That seems substantially the same plan as I see here. I guess
> that the different output order must reflect a platform-specific
> difference in qsort()'s treatment of equal keys.
>
> Probably the best answer is to add "ORDER BY shoename" to the test
> query to eliminate the platform dependenc
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hm, what do you get from
>> explain SELECT * FROM shoe_ready WHERE total_avail >= 2;
>> in the regression database?
>
> [this plan]
That seems substantially the same plan as I see here. I guess
that the different output order must reflect
Attached.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 30 August 2002 2:31 PM
> To: Christopher Kings-Lynne
> Cc: Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RULE regression test failure
>
>
> "Christopher Kings-L
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> U...how do I make the regression database!? Do I have to do
> installcheck instead of check?
That's the easiest way; or you can restart the temp postmaster that
the regression script starts and kills.
regards, t
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> U...how do I make the regression database!? Do I have to do
> installcheck instead of check?
yes
Database is 'regression'
g
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe com
Re: [HACKERS] RULE regression test failure
>
>
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > With the recent talk of RULE regression failures, I thought I'd
> bring back
> > up that I _always_ have a rule failure on Freebsd/alpha.
>
> Hm
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With the recent talk of RULE regression failures, I thought I'd bring back
> up that I _always_ have a rule failure on Freebsd/alpha.
Hm, what do you get from
explain SELECT * FROM shoe_ready WHERE total_avail >= 2;
in the regression
With the recent talk of RULE regression failures, I thought I'd bring back
up that I _always_ have a rule failure on Freebsd/alpha.
The files are attached...
Chris
regression.diffs
Description: Binary data
regression.out
Description: Binary data
---(end of broadcas
OK,
On HEAD, I am still seeing the attached failures. They didn't happen
before, but appeared in the last couple of months. All other tests pass.
It seems to just be a tuple ordering issue - I really don't know what caused
it? If necessary, I can just modify the expected result, but I haven't
11 matches
Mail list logo
