> You are attacking here two things:
>
> a) schemas, which should be done in 7.3,
Is imho something different alltogether. (I know we have two opposed
views here)
> thus multiple databases on same host would be unnecessary.
I disagree :-)
>
> b) connections to remote host' databases, whic
You are attacking here two things:
a) schemas, which should be done in 7.3, thus multiple databases on same
host would be unnecessary.
b) connections to remote host' databases, which is partially implemented
already (in a ugly way, but...) see contrib/dblink
What you described is a syntactic s
Hi!
0. I think access to other databases is really important. There was
a discussion about that. Using a dot operator to specify a
database (schema) seems to be very standard and elegant.
But there is another way to implement it. Here is my
suggestion.
1. First, some syntax:
CREATE [ SHARED ] [
