On 27 November 2016 at 11:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Cramer writes:
> > We are proposing changing the JDBC version from
> > 9.4. to 42.x.x
>
> > We have two issues we are trying to address here.
>
> > 1) we do not want to be tied to the server release schedule. This has
> been
> > somewhat a
Dave Cramer writes:
> We are proposing changing the JDBC version from
> 9.4. to 42.x.x
> We have two issues we are trying to address here.
> 1) we do not want to be tied to the server release schedule. This has been
> somewhat addressed already but has left us with the second issue.
> 2) Av
We are proposing changing the JDBC version from
9.4. to 42.x.x
We have two issues we are trying to address here.
1) we do not want to be tied to the server release schedule. This has been
somewhat addressed already but has left us with the second issue.
2) Avoid confusion as to which version
