Re: [HACKERS] RE: [ADMIN] SOS !!: Porstgress forgot all ! Help !

2001-02-14 Thread Vadim Mikheev
> > O, your system reached max transaction ID -:( > > That's two reports now of people who have managed to wrap around the XID > counter. It doesn't seem that hard to do in a heavily used database. > > Does anyone want to take more seriously the stopgap solution I proposed > for this proble

Re: [HACKERS] RE: [ADMIN] SOS !!: Porstgress forgot all ! Help !

2001-02-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Mikheev, Vadim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> before this manipulmation, pg_log = 1.073.741.824 > O, your system reached max transaction ID -:( That's two reports now of people who have managed to wrap around the XID counter. It doesn't seem that hard to do in a heavily used database. Do

[HACKERS] RE: [ADMIN] SOS !!: Porstgress forgot all ! Help !

2001-02-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> before this manipulmation, pg_log = 1.073.741.824 O, your system reached max transaction ID -:( > and xmin = 4982339 And now all tuples with xmin > ~500 are invisible. One way to restore data could be hack vacuum to update xmin of all valid tuples to 512, vacuum all tables, dump dat

[HACKERS] RE: [ADMIN] SOS !!: Porstgress forgot all ! Help !

2001-02-12 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> Then if I reindex my DB I have : > > NOTICE: --Relation astro-- > NOTICE: Pages 204: Changed 0, reaped 0, Empty 0, New 0; Tup > 4878: Vac 0, Keep/VTL 0/0, Crash 0, UnUsed 0, MinLen 324, MaxLen 324; > Re-using: Free/Avail. Space 0/0; EndEmpty/Avail. Pages 0/0. CPU 0.04s/0.18u sec. > NOTICE: