Re: [HACKERS] RC1 core dumps in initdb on Solaris 2.6

2001-03-28 Thread Pete Forman
Pete Forman writes: > I've registered the result via the web form though the report is > not accurate. Can somebody update the Remarks or Version field to > indicate that I was using a snapshot rather than RC1 OOTB. Further to that request, please ignore/delete the existing Remarks. I have l

Re: [HACKERS] RC1 core dumps in initdb on Solaris 2.6

2001-03-28 Thread Pete Forman
Tom Lane writes: > Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The regression test is failing early on, during initdb. The core > > file indicates that there is a SIGBUS. Hopefully the bugs fixed > > as a result of the "More bogus alignment assumptions" thread will > > sort things out. >

Re: [HACKERS] RC1 core dumps in initdb on Solaris 2.6

2001-03-27 Thread Tom Lane
Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The regression test is failing early on, during initdb. The core file > indicates that there is a SIGBUS. Hopefully the bugs fixed as a > result of the "More bogus alignment assumptions" thread will sort > things out. Sure looks like this is the same is

[HACKERS] RC1 core dumps in initdb on Solaris 2.6

2001-03-27 Thread Pete Forman
The regression test is failing early on, during initdb. The core file indicates that there is a SIGBUS. Hopefully the bugs fixed as a result of the "More bogus alignment assumptions" thread will sort things out. Here are initdb.log and the stack trace. If needs be I can recompile with -g but u