Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm starting to get a better idea of what's going on here though. Is it the
> case that the operators in the operator class are only used when actually
> doing an index scan?
Not even that, really. The operator class is what the planner uses to
detect that
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't understand what overlap_{left,right} are supposed to mean.
>
> In this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-03/msg01135.php
> we had decided that the rtree stuff is not only poorly do
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't understand what overlap_{left,right} are supposed to mean.
In this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-03/msg01135.php
we had decided that the rtree stuff is not only poorly documented
but actively broken. I had thought that B
I don't understand what overlap_{left,right} are supposed to mean.
In general what seems to be missing from the documentation of operator
strategies and support functions is what invariants between them are required.
Can I just make up a meaning for overlap_{left,right}? That's what other
r-tree
