On 3/21/17 21:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> This question is still open. Do we want to keep the new linking style
> Section 1.2.3, "Title", or revert back to the old style just Section
> 1.2.3? It's a simple toggle setting.
Changed back to old style, per discussion.
--
Peter Eisentraut
Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> On 1/4/17 11:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Anyway, bottom line is I'm not terribly excited about fixing just this
>>> one place. I think we need to decide whether we like the new more-verbose
>>> output for links. If we don't, we need to fix the markup rules to not do
>>
On 1/11/17 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/4/17 11:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Anyway, bottom line is I'm not terribly excited about fixing just this
>> one place. I think we need to decide whether we like the new more-verbose
>> output for links. If we don't, we need to fix the markup rules
On 1/6/17 8:56 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> You could argue that nobody reads the PG docs on dead trees anymore
> and we should embrace the hyperlink style with enthusiasm. I wouldn't
> be against that personally, but there are a lot of places to change if
> we decide that parenthe
On 1/4/17 11:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Anyway, bottom line is I'm not terribly excited about fixing just this
> one place. I think we need to decide whether we like the new more-verbose
> output for links. If we don't, we need to fix the markup rules to not do
> that. If we do, there are a lot of
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:39:57PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Since I've spent a fair amount of brainpower trying to use
> rather than where possible, I'm not innately enthusiastic about
> a project whose end is to get rid of . I won't lose a lot of
> sleep over it if we decide to go that direc
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> However, that complaint was already lodged in another thread. What I
> think *this* thread is about is whether we ought to switch from the
> up-to-now-project-standard style
>
> ... how to frob your wug (see ) ...
>
> to
>
> ... how to f
Robert Haas writes:
> Personally, I think that if the doc toolchain changeover changed the
> way xrefs render - and it seems that it did - that's a bug that ought
> to be fixed,
I quite agree. We'll have enough to do with the toolchain changeover;
we don't need random changes in what common mark
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I don't think there are a lto of people who use dead tree editions anymore,
but they certainly do exist. A lot of people use the PDFs though,
particularly fo
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> whether to continue using "see section m.n"-type cross-references
For my part, I have a preference for including the section name
with the link text, although if it took much work to add it (rather
than being the new default) I might question wh
Robert Haas writes:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I don't think there are a lto of people who use dead tree editions anymore,
>>> but they certainly do exist. A lot of people use the PDFs though,
>>> particularly for offline reading or loading them in ebook readers. So it
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't think there are a lto of people who use dead tree editions anymore,
>> but they certainly do exist. A lot of people use the PDFs though,
>> particularly for offline reading or loading them in ebook readers. So it
>> still has to be workab
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well ... that will read nicely in output formats that have hyperlinks,
>> but not so well on plain dead trees where the cross-reference is either
>> invisible or an explicit footnote. Our typical convention for this sor
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> > In:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/runtime-
> config-file-locations.html
> > "Specifies the configuration file for Section 20.2, $B!H (BUser Name
> Maps $B!I (B
> > user name mapping" looks pretty stran
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> In:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/runtime-config-file-locations.html
> "Specifies the configuration file for Section 20.2, $B!H(BUser Name
> Maps$B!I(B
> user name mapping" looks pretty strange to me because a raw section
> name appears.
Yeah, it's def
In:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/runtime-config-file-locations.html
---
ident_file (string)
Specifies the configuration file for Section 20.2, “User Name Maps” user
name mapping (customarily called pg_ident.conf). This parameter
16 matches
Mail list logo
