Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And indeed in pg_type the typalign column says "i" for this data type. My
> question is just, why? What would be the problem with an alignment of 1 for
> "name"?
Probably none, but that's how it's been defined since day one, and there
doesn't seem any good
In c.h There is the following comment:
/*
* We want NameData to have length NAMEDATALEN and int alignment,
* because that's how the data type 'name' is defined in pg_type.
* Use a union to make sure the compiler agrees. Note that NAMEDATALEN
* must be a multiple of sizeof(int), else sizeof(N
