On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Dennis Butterstein wrote:
> I tried the proposed tweaks and
> see some differences regarding the measurements.
> Unfortunately the variance between the runs seems to remain high.
Using these techniques I managed to get standard deviation below 1.5%
in my read-only
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Dennis Butterstein wrote:
> Hi Marti, thank you for your quick reply. I tried the proposed tweaks and
> see some differences regarding the measurements. It seems as if the overall
> query performance dropped a little what I think the disabled turbo boost
> mode is
Hi Marti,thank you for your quick reply.I tried the proposed tweaks and see
some differences regarding the measurements. It seems as if the overall
query performance dropped a little what I think the disabled turbo boost
mode is responsible for (all measurements are single query only). I think
tha
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Dennis Butterstein wrote:
> I expect my current changes to be resposible for about 0.2-0.3s for this
> query but because of the huge time differences I am not able to quantify my
> changes.
>
> Maybe somebody can tell me about a better approach to quantify my chan
Hello everybody,
I am currently trying to squeeze some performance out of the current
predicate evaluation implementation. In fact I was able to get some positive
results.
I have some more points on my developement plan, but I am facing the problem
that theses changes will only help very little wh
