Andrew Dunstan escribió:
> What would be useful for many purposes, and is a long-standing
> project of mine that I still haven't found time to make progress on,
> is that the server should contain functions to produce the creation
> SQL for all its own objects, free of the locks that pg_dump requi
On 03/21/2014 09:38 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Craig Ringer writes:
Here's how I think it needs to look:
[ move all the functionality to the backend ]
Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
of exactly zero use t
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer writes:
>> Here's how I think it needs to look:
>> [ move all the functionality to the backend ]
>
> Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
> of exactly zero use to its supposed principal use-case,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer writes:
> > Here's how I think it needs to look:
> > [ move all the functionality to the backend ]
>
> Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
> of exactly zero use to its supposed principal use-case
On 03/21/2014 11:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer writes:
>> Here's how I think it needs to look:
>> [ move all the functionality to the backend ]
>
> Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
> of exactly zero use to its supposed principal use-case, pg_dump.
Craig Ringer writes:
> Here's how I think it needs to look:
> [ move all the functionality to the backend ]
Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
of exactly zero use to its supposed principal use-case, pg_dump. pg_dump
will still have to support server versions
On 03/21/2014 09:28 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Alexandr wrote:
>> Rewrite (add) pg_dump and pg_restore utilities as libraries (.so, .dll &
>> .dylib)
>
> This strikes me as (1) pretty vague and (2) probably too hard for a
> summer project.
>
> I mean, getting the e
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Alexandr wrote:
> Rewrite (add) pg_dump and pg_restore utilities as libraries (.so, .dll &
> .dylib)
This strikes me as (1) pretty vague and (2) probably too hard for a
summer project.
I mean, getting the existing binaries to build libraries that you can
call wit
Hello!
Here is the text of my proposal which I've applied to GSoC.
(and link
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s-Q4rzEysPxo-dINsk_eKFJOBoVjNYDrQ-Oh75gtYEM/edit?usp=sharing)
Any suggestions and comments are welcome.
*
PostgreSQL GSoC 2014 proposal
Project name
Rewrite (add) pg_dump and pg_
