Tom,
> Josh's proposal looks pretty good to me in general, though some of the
> details seem a little odd. "max_files_per_process" doesn't belong under
> lock management (perhaps better to stick it under Memory Usage, possibly
> renaming that category to Resource Consumption) and the Query Tuning
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Agreed, postgresql.conf and the documentation should match. Guc.c needs
> to be in variable _type_ order, so I don't know what can be done
> there.
We could make each table in guc.c follow the logical ordering Josh
suggests for its subset of the variabl
Bruce,
> I don't think people change _that_ _many_ postgresql.conf settings, so
> reordering should be OK with them, especially if they get a clearer
> output.
Yeah. I put in the objection because Elein already made it to me.
I also think that most people don't adjust *enough* Postgresql.conf s
Bruce,
> I have developed the following patch to address these issues. I have
> removed the lock GUC settings from postgresql.conf, as suggested. (They
> aren't even enabled in the general builds.)
Great! Just to keep you from getting complacent, what follows is a proposal
for re-ordering th
