Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Performance improvement for unique checks

2010-03-27 Thread Josh Berkus
On 3/27/10 12:11 AM, Gokulakannan Somasundaram wrote: > I don't think this should involve much code change. But no-one > interested We're in the test period for 9.0, so potential 9.1 features are going to get less attention. If it's a small amount of code, I suggest just writing the patch and

[HACKERS] Proposal for Performance improvement for unique checks

2010-03-27 Thread Gokulakannan Somasundaram
I don't think this should involve much code change. But no-one interested On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Gokulakannan Somasundaram < gokul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, >Since we insert a new entry into the index for every update that's being > made into the table, we inevitably make a uni