On 12/02/2010 12:44 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
wrote:
If possible can you provide glimpses of History.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navigational_database
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARK_IV_%28software%29
I don't want to go back there, myself. YMMV.
Me either. BTDTGTTS. :-)
cheers
wrote:
> If possible can you provide glimpses of History.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navigational_database
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARK_IV_%28software%29
I don't want to go back there, myself. YMMV.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
I know world's population. Non of the person thinks alike and still many
peoples goal can be the same. Nothing is virgin in this world. If
someone thinks like that then it is a mistake. My aim is to prove that
Postgresql can be the great leader if we put natural intelligence in
database which is m
which is missing
all over.
Regards,
Vijay.
Experience the Excellence..
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 8:20 pm
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: First step towards
Intelligent,integrateddatabase
To: ghatpa...@vsnl.net
Cc: Dann Corbit , pgsql ha
, December 1, 2010 8:32 pm
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: First step towards
Intelligent,integrateddatabase
To: Tom Lane
Cc: ghatpa...@vsnl.net, Dann Corbit , pgsql hackers
>
>
> On 12/01/2010 09:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > ghatpa...@vsnl.net writes:
> >> Create domain is onl
> Something that did what Pavel mentioned:
>
> SELECT name, parent->name FROM children;
>
> would be very useful. It means you no longer have to write explicit joins (or
> perhaps more accurately, you no longer have to specify exactly how to join
> the two tables).
Already exists:
http://htsq
.net wrote:
> > Be positive ... Negative thoughts are not good...
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: David Fetter
> > Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 8:42 pm
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: First step towards
> Intelligent,integrateddatabase>
On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 09:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ghatpa...@vsnl.net writes:
>>> Create domain is only useful for abstracting common constraints on fields
>>> into single location for maintenance. It may not be useful to link tables.
>> It's still uncle
David Fetter
> Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 8:42 pm
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: First step towards
> Intelligent,integrateddatabase
> To: ghatpa...@vsnl.net
> Cc: pgsql hackers
>
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 03:19:32PM +0500, ghatpa...@vsnl.net wrote:
> >
Be positive ... Negative thoughts are not good...
- Original Message -
From: David Fetter
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 8:42 pm
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: First step towards
Intelligent,integrateddatabase
To: ghatpa...@vsnl.net
Cc: pgsql hackers
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at
On 12/01/2010 09:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
ghatpa...@vsnl.net writes:
Create domain is only useful for abstracting common constraints on fields into
single location for maintenance. It may not be useful to link tables.
It's still unclear what this does that you don't get from inheritance,
typed
ghatpa...@vsnl.net writes:
> Create domain is only useful for abstracting common constraints on fields
> into single location for maintenance. It may not be useful to link tables.
It's still unclear what this does that you don't get from inheritance,
typed tables, use of a table's rowtype as a fi
Create domain is only useful for abstracting common constraints on fields into
single location for maintenance. It may not be useful to link tables.
- Original Message -
From: Dann Corbit
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 4:04 pm
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Proposal: First step towards
13 matches
Mail list logo
