On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Josh Tolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:23:17PM -0600, Josh Tolley wrote:
> > >> SPI_push();
> > >> r
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:23:17PM -0600, Josh Tolley wrote:
> >> SPI_push();
> >> retval =
> >> InputFunctionCall(&flinfo, lolVarGetString(returnVal, true),
> >> resul
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:23:17PM -0600, Josh Tolley wrote:
>> SPI_push();
>> retval =
>> InputFunctionCall(&flinfo, lolVarGetString(returnVal, true),
>> resultTypeIOParam, -1);
>> SPI_pop();
> Won't this cause the return value to be allocated
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:23:17PM -0600, Josh Tolley wrote:
> SPI_push();
> retval =
> InputFunctionCall(&flinfo, lolVarGetString(returnVal, true),
> resultTypeIOParam, -1);
> SPI_pop();
Won't
Having posted this to -general [1] per -hackers list instructions [2]
to try elsewhere first, and waited (not very long, I admit) in vain
for a response, I'm posting this to -hackers now. My apologies if my
impatience in that regard annoys.
While developing PL/LOLCODE, I've found something wrong w
