Silvio Mazzaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However... it's strange but /var/lib/pgsql/data/PG_VERSION answers:
> 7.2
> !!!
Yeah? Well, that explains something I was wondering about, which is why
the PG_VERSION mismatch complaint didn't come out first.
Where exactly did you get the server code
On Wednesday 17 March 2004 21:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> That is evidently a 7.1 database, not a 7.2 database. I'm surprised
> that you don't get the other version check message first --- we must
> have gotten the order of testing a mite confused ... anyway you need a
> 7.1 server.
Thank you for answ
Silvio Mazzaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A made a tar backup copy of /var/lib/pgsql, but now (I'm still with Postgre
> 7.2 on a RedHat 7.3) restoring the data and launching the daemon i receive:
> postmaster successfully started
> bash-2.05$ FATAL 2: The database cluster was initialized with
Hi all!
We've a problem...
A made a tar backup copy of /var/lib/pgsql, but now (I'm still with Postgre
7.2 on a RedHat 7.3) restoring the data and launching the daemon i receive:
postmaster successfully started
bash-2.05$ FATAL 2: The database cluster was initialized with
CATALOG_VERSION_NO 2
