Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Triggers issue

2010-02-10 Thread Euler Taveira de Oliveira
u235sentinel escreveu: > I'm curious what context you were expecting and which group this should > go to. I've posted similar questions in the other groups and they > seem... lost at times. > What group? AFAICS this question belongs to -general. What about starting to show us the definition of m_

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Triggers issue

2010-02-10 Thread u235sentinel
Tom Lane wrote: u235sentinel writes: I have a strange problem we noticed the other day with triggers. We're running 8.3.3 on Solaris 10 (intel) and have a feed that comes in regularly to populate a table we're working on. The feed works just fine inserting rows however the following trig

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Triggers issue

2010-02-10 Thread Tom Lane
u235sentinel writes: > I have a strange problem we noticed the other day with triggers. We're > running 8.3.3 on Solaris 10 (intel) and have a feed that comes in > regularly to populate a table we're working on. The feed works just > fine inserting rows however the following trigger stops the

[HACKERS] Postgres Triggers issue

2010-02-10 Thread u235sentinel
I have a strange problem we noticed the other day with triggers. We're running 8.3.3 on Solaris 10 (intel) and have a feed that comes in regularly to populate a table we're working on. The feed works just fine inserting rows however the following trigger stops the feed until we remove the tri