Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4

2001-04-13 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can you give me specific text? I though 7.1 was a little better about > preserving the metadata. Not in the least --- 7.1's CLUSTER is just as bad as ever. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4

2001-04-09 Thread Gavin Sherry
Bruce, Problem is the use of heap_drop_with_catalog(). * heap_drop_with_catalog - removes all record of named relation from catalogs * * 1) open relation, check for existence, etc. * 2) remove inheritance information * 3) r

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4

2001-04-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Hi all, > > On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > If, by Friday, April 13th, there have been no bugs reported, all that will > > happen is that rc4 will get renamed as the official release, no > > repackaging or anything ... > > Was hoping that I'd have some time to get around to

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4

2001-04-09 Thread Gavin Sherry
Hi all, On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > If, by Friday, April 13th, there have been no bugs reported, all that will > happen is that rc4 will get renamed as the official release, no > repackaging or anything ... Was hoping that I'd have some time to get around to it before now, bu