Kurt Harriman wrote:
On 12/16/2009 7:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
the project policy is to not require any compiler features not found
> in C89.
Is there somewhere a compendium of such policies which
fledgling hackers should consult to avoid embarrassment?
The list of suggestions at http://wiki.po
Robert Haas writes:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Kurt Harriman wrote:
>> Is there somewhere a compendium of such policies which
>> fledgling hackers should consult to avoid embarrassment?
> I do think your basic point is well-taken, though. There are a lot of
> details about how we do th
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Kurt Harriman wrote:
> On 12/16/2009 7:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> the project policy is to not require any compiler features not found
>
>> in C89.
>
> Is there somewhere a compendium of such policies which
> fledgling hackers should consult to avoid embarrassme
On ons, 2009-12-16 at 07:44 -0800, Kurt Harriman wrote:
> On 12/16/2009 7:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > the project policy is to not require any compiler features not found
> > in C89.
>
> Is there somewhere a compendium of such policies which
> fledgling hackers should consult to avoid embarrassme
On 12/16/2009 7:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
the project policy is to not require any compiler features not found
> in C89.
Is there somewhere a compendium of such policies which
fledgling hackers should consult to avoid embarrassment?
Regards,
... kurt
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsq
