>> > They stopped at 7.2.4 because "they're finishing some usefull APIs,
>> > which'll make the port much more "easy"."
>>
>> Will this involve using a Linux kernel ;)
>
> :) No, a NW kernel with a POSIX library. This'll be great, because
> :you'll can run powerfull opensource software with an ent
> > They stopped at 7.2.4 because "they're finishing some usefull APIs,
> > which'll make the port much more "easy"."
>
> Will this involve using a Linux kernel ;)
:) No, a NW kernel with a POSIX library. This'll be great, because you'll
can run powerfull opensource software with an enterprise-c
Eduardo D Piovesam kirjutas E, 20.10.2003 kell 16:35:
> They stopped at 7.2.4 because "they're finishing some usefull APIs,
> which'll make the port much more "easy"."
Will this involve using a Linux kernel ;)
> When this part is done, a new port will be made with 7.4. With much
> less "NetWare s
They stopped at 7.2.4 because "they're finishing
some usefull APIs, which'll make the port much more"easy"."
When this part is done, a new port will be made
with 7.4. With much less "NetWare specific code" and maybe, it'll be "accepted" by the PostgreSQL community.
Regards,
Eduardo
>Why 7.2.4 I wonder? And I don't see anything there in the CVS repository. I know they
>are not obliged to show us the source code, but doing so would be nice (especially to
>see the threading part).
Hi Andrew,
here you have the source code:
http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/project/showfi
"Eduardo D Piovesam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,> > > It's been quite a while ago that I did
NetWare programming (3.11 NLM,> > communication protocol for a dbms),
and that I had some contact with> > Netware (4.1), but if Novell
didn't change the archi
Hi,
> It's been quite a while ago that I did NetWare programming (3.11 NLM,
> communication protocol for a dbms), and that I had some contact with
> Netware (4.1), but if Novell didn't change the architecture completely
> (I doubt that) the native win32 port won't be of any help for
They've done
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Some time ago there was a guy from Novell posting on hackers about the
> > porting of PostgreSQL to Netware. He sounded like most of the job was
> > already done, but he wanted to have some patches accepted to be able to
> > build wi
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some time ago there was a guy from Novell posting on hackers about the
> porting of PostgreSQL to Netware. He sounded like most of the job was
> already done, but he wanted to have some patches accepted to be able to
> build with a toolchain different f
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:52:58PM +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Terry Yapt wrote:
>
> >I have seen this presentation for new Novell Netware 6.5 version
> >released about two weeks or so.
> >
> >http://www.novell.com/products/netware/netware65overview_popup.html
> >
> >If you check 'Open Source' p
Terry Yapt wrote:
Hello all,
I have seen this presentation for new Novell Netware 6.5 version
released about two weeks or so.
http://www.novell.com/products/netware/netware65overview_popup.html
If you check 'Open Source' point, PostgreSQL text and PostgreSQL logo
are showed on the run.
I would b
Hello all,
I have seen this presentation for new Novell Netware 6.5 version
released about two weeks or so.
http://www.novell.com/products/netware/netware65overview_popup.html
If you check 'Open Source' point, PostgreSQL text and PostgreSQL logo
are showed on the run.
I would be very happy if w
12 matches
Mail list logo
