Hi,
Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008, Tom Dunstan a écrit :
> I guess that means you missed both the original discussion at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00132.php and
> my initial patch in that direction and subsequent discussion at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hacke
Oops, sent with wrong from header...
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Tom Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dimitri Fontaine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:40:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL extensions packaging
Hi!
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I promised to have an in-depth look at the archives before to spend time on
> my ideas for $subject, but failed to do so.
I guess that means you missed both the original discussion at
http://archives.postgresql.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I promised to have an in-depth look at the archives before to spend
time on my ideas for $subject, but failed to do so. Here are the ideas
(user level design if you will) :)
As a PostgreSQL extension developer (see http://pgfoundry.org/proj
