Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows

2003-06-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
tive Windows version of Postgres > in-process (that is in client's process)? > > Thanks. > > -Original Message- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:37 AM > To: Yurgis Baykshtis > Cc: PostGreSQL mailing list >

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows

2003-06-16 Thread Yurgis Baykshtis
9:37 AM To: Yurgis Baykshtis Cc: PostGreSQL mailing list Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows Yurgis Baykshtis wrote: > > We have a similar question about upcoming Windows "native" release: > > Is it going to be multithreaded or one process per connection like on &g

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows

2003-06-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Yurgis Baykshtis wrote: > > We have a similar question about upcoming Windows "native" release: > > Is it going to be multithreaded or one process per connection like on > cygwin? One connection per process. The only multithreaded Win32 is SRA's commercial product. -- Bruce Momjian

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows

2003-06-16 Thread Yurgis Baykshtis
st Subject: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows Hi, I would like to know if in the Windows installer version, you still plan to use cygwin to setup PostgreSQL ? If no, how do you setup files and parameters ? Moreover, What are the traps to pay attention when we install PostgreSQL on Windows ? t

[HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows

2003-06-11 Thread P.M
Hi, I would like to know if in the Windows installer version, you still plan to use cygwin to setup PostgreSQL ? If no, how do you setup files and parameters ? Moreover, What are the traps to pay attention when we install PostgreSQL on Windows ? tia, X04001 __ D