I have suggested a similar feature before and met with little enthusiasm:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d960cb61b694cf459dcfb4b0128514c2f34...@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
I still think it would be a nice feature and would make pg_service.conf
more useful than it is now.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
Tom,
I believe there are two main concerns that you raise, addressed below:
First:
> It needs to be a more constrained syntax.
> One possibility is to insist that the wildcard be only a part
> of the name string, eg
>
> [myservers-%]
> host=%.domain.com
> port=5433
> user=admi
"Doyle, Bryan" writes:
> Would specifying a special value for the service name, perhaps [%], be an
> acceptable implementation of this enhancement/fix to my above concerns?
> Example:
> # comment
> [%]
> host=%.domain.com
> port=5433
> user=admin
This doesn't seem like a ter
Hi,
I am looking to patch the LDAP Service Name feature and would like some
feedback prior to doing so. In general, while I personally view this as a bug
fix, it could also easily be considered to simply be an enhancement to current
functionality and therefore the below is written as a propos
