Tatsuo,
> I'm wondering if this was approved or not...
We haven't approved *anything* yet. The deadline was just Saturday, and I'm
still keying stuff into the conference management system.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:38:30PM -0500, Rod Taylor wrote:
> One example might be a 'self-aggregating' structure. Start with one
> entry per minute in a table indexed by time. After 2 weeks passes, the
> per-minute data is aggregated and the single entry at the start of the
> day is updated with t
On Monday 20 March 2006 03:31, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > > Well, aside from anything else, we seem likely to have
> >
> > you, Devrim,
> >
> > > > Magnus and maybe even Robert Treat there (Robert?). Which
> > >
> > > would mean
> > >
> > > > a good time for a meeting of the Web Team, yes?
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 March 2006 08:31
> To: Dave Page; Devrim GUNDUZ; Josh Berkus
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL
> Anniversary
> > > Well, aside from anything else, we seem likely to have
> you, Devrim,
> > > Magnus and maybe even Robert Treat there (Robert?). Which
> > would mean
> > > a good time for a meeting of the Web Team, yes?
> >
> > It seems that I'll be there, and yes, a PostgreSQL.org web
> development
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 March 2006 23:08
> To: Josh Berkus
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page;
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL
> Anniversary Prop
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> Hm, I already talked about that once:
> http://www.postgresql.org/files/developer/transactions.pdf
> but perhaps that's not the level of detail you are after?
>
Yeah, I've read the presentation -- and yes, that's not the level I am
after. Actually, I guess
Dave,
> I wouldn't mind talking (or hosting a discussion) but have been unable to
> think of anything that other hackers might be interested in. I obviously
> can't discuss the server internals in any great depth, but if anyone wants
> to hear about pgadmin, pginstaller, the web infrastructure or
Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> I am really interested in the concurrency control part of the PostgreSQL. I
> can see the MVCC/lock rules there, and basically I can follow them -- but
> there are so many if-else in the rules, so the problem always for me is: how
> can we gaurantee that the rules are comple
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2006-03-18 kell 12:38, kirjutas Rod Taylor:
> This will, presumably, be a very PostgreSQL friendly group so a sales
> pitch isn't really required.
>
> How about the opposite? Tom Lanes list of areas that PostgreSQL does a
> poor job and a detailed explanation as to how that
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 22:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus writes:
> > -- There are only 13 days left to submit a proposal. Please do so. We'd
> > rather not be forced into a last-minute rush to evaluate all of the stuff
> > in April. Remember this is a "family" event so you don't have
-Original Message-
From: "Josh Berkus"
Sent: 18/03/06 01:55:04
To: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org"
Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update
> Heck, if you have
> an id
"Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>> What would people like to hear about?
> I am really interested in the concurrency control part of the PostgreSQL.
Hm, I already talked about that once:
http://www.postgresql.org/files/developer/transactions.pdf
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> What would people like to hear about?
>
I am really interested in the concurrency control part of the PostgreSQL. I
can see the MVCC/lock rules there, and basically I can follow them -- but
there are so many if-else in the rules, so the problem always for
Josh Berkus writes:
> -- There are only 13 days left to submit a proposal. Please do so. We'd
> rather not be forced into a last-minute rush to evaluate all of the stuff
> in April. Remember this is a "family" event so you don't have to have all
> of your materials together before you send s
Folks,
Wanted to update you on a few things regarding speaking at the upcoming
PostgreSQL Anniversary Summit:
-- There are only 13 days left to submit a proposal. Please do so. We'd
rather not be forced into a last-minute rush to evaluate all of the stuff
in April. Remember this is a "famil
16 matches
Mail list logo
