Cool. Thanks for the information. The only other PAIO effort that I
knew of was the glibc user space effort...
Greg
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 12:36, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:59:11AM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
> > It doesn't really say, however, it makes me wonder if it's S
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:59:11AM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote:
> It doesn't really say, however, it makes me wonder if it's SGI's KAIO
> (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/kaio/) effort which is reported to provide
> up to 35% performance improvement for heavily I/O bound applications.
I don't think it
It doesn't really say, however, it makes me wonder if it's SGI's KAIO
(http://oss.sgi.com/projects/kaio/) effort which is reported to provide
up to 35% performance improvement for heavily I/O bound applications.
Again, I'm not sure it is SGI's effort that is being talked about here,
nonetheless,
Hi everyone,
I just read the annoucement of the public beta for Red Hat Linux's new
server-oriented edition (code named Pensacola) :
https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/redhat-watch-list/2002-February/000466.html
One of the things this mentions being included/tuned in its kernel is :
POSIX