Re: [HACKERS] Port report: NetBSD 2.0 mac68k

2005-01-06 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2004 23:07 schrieb Rémi Zara: >> Here is a port report for NetBSD 2.0 mac68k, with sources of >> postgresql8.0.0rc1. > It seems we have fixed the assembly syntax and the float8 failure, but the > failure in the misc test see

Re: [HACKERS] Port report: NetBSD 2.0 mac68k

2005-01-06 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2004 23:07 schrieb Rémi Zara: > Here is a port report for NetBSD 2.0 mac68k, with sources of > postgresql8.0.0rc1. It seems we have fixed the assembly syntax and the float8 failure, but the failure in the misc test seems pretty bogus. Has anyone looked into that furthe

Re: [HACKERS] Port report: NetBSD 2.0 mac68k

2004-12-24 Thread Rémi Zara
Le 21 déc. 04, à 06:45, Bruce Momjian a écrit : Rémi Zara wrote: Le 16 d?c. 04, ? 22:48, Bruce Momjian a ?crit : I am confused by the threading failure. I don't see any free() call in thread_test.c. Would you go to the tools/thread directory and run the program manually and use a debugger to s

Re: [HACKERS] Port report: NetBSD 2.0 mac68k

2004-12-20 Thread Rémi Zara
Le 16 déc. 04, à 22:48, Bruce Momjian a écrit : I am confused by the threading failure. I don't see any free() call in thread_test.c. Would you go to the tools/thread directory and run the program manually and use a debugger to see the failure line? Is there some threading flag NetBSD requires

Re: [HACKERS] Port report: NetBSD 2.0 mac68k

2004-12-18 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, I modified the m64k spinlock patch to more cleanly merge into our code, attached. Applied. --- Rémi Zara wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a port report for NetBSD 2.0 mac68k, with sources of > postgresql8.0.0rc1. > > Here i

Re: [HACKERS] Port report: NetBSD 2.0 mac68k

2004-12-18 Thread Bruce Momjian
Rémi Zara wrote: > > Le 16 d?c. 04, ? 22:48, Bruce Momjian a ?crit : > > > > > I am confused by the threading failure. I don't see any free() call in > > thread_test.c. Would you go to the tools/thread directory and run the > > program manually and use a debugger to see the failure line? Is t

Re: [HACKERS] Port report: NetBSD 2.0 mac68k

2004-12-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
I will apply the ASM changes that affect only NetBSD mac68k ELF. Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --

Re: [HACKERS] Port report: NetBSD 2.0 mac68k

2004-12-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
I am confused by the threading failure. I don't see any free() call in thread_test.c. Would you go to the tools/thread directory and run the program manually and use a debugger to see the failure line? Is there some threading flag NetBSD requires for compiles or linking? -

[HACKERS] Port report: NetBSD 2.0 mac68k

2004-12-14 Thread Rémi Zara
Hi, Here is a port report for NetBSD 2.0 mac68k, with sources of postgresql8.0.0rc1. Here is the configure line used : ./configure --prefix=/data/postgresql/pgsql-8.0.0rc1 --with-openssl --with-python --with-perl --with-tcl --with-krb5 --with-pam But some tweaking was necessary to make it wor