Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Also, we need manual testing because people will do goofy things that
> > the test will not try, I am sure. :-)
>
> Agreed, but just want to make sure that Simon realizes that this 'level'
> of documentation is required
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>
> >>> HIGH
> >>> 1. Documentation (sr) (now)
> >>> - Backup and Recovery chapter
> >>> - WAL chapter
> >>
> >> Docs, as always, can be delivered/impro
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> > HIGH
> > 1. Documentation (sr) (now)
> > - Backup and Recovery chapter
> > - WAL chapter
>
> Docs, as always, can be delivered/improved throughout beta ...
Yes, but without PITR docs there is no way to test the feature.
Many
On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 04:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Other than the spectacular lack of documentation, I don't think we are
> >> in bad shape at all.
>
> > OK, that helps. Alvaro had a number of items floating around and I
> > wasn't sur
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Other than the spectacular lack of documentation, I don't think we are
>> in bad shape at all.
> OK, that helps. Alvaro had a number of items floating around and I
> wasn't sure where he was on them. Same with PITR. Once the number
