On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 04:26:27PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> >So, is there a formal project setup anywhere for the migration? ISTM
> >that it would be best to create a project on either gborg or pgfoundry
> >with the intention that it produce a
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
So, is there a formal project setup anywhere for the migration? ISTM
that it would be best to create a project on either gborg or pgfoundry
with the intention that it produce a set of code/scripts/procedures that
allow for migrating projects from gborg
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:11:46PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >Actually, it should be entirely possible to setup forwarding for
> >projects as they migrate, one-by-one. AFAIK mailman will handle
> >something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] being forwarded to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Woo hoo ... a mai
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:49:30PM +0700, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
On Mon, February 20, 2006 11:00, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Speaking for libpqxx, my only concern with that is the mailing list.
Would those have to move to different addresses--or conve
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:49:30PM +0700, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> On Mon, February 20, 2006 11:00, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >> Speaking for libpqxx, my only concern with that is the mailing list.
> >> Would those have to move to different addresses--or conversely, would a
> >> forced migra
On Mon, February 20, 2006 11:00, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> Speaking for libpqxx, my only concern with that is the mailing list.
>> Would those have to move to different addresses--or conversely, would a
>> forced migration make it much easier to move *all* GBorg mailing lists
>> to
>> pgFoundry a
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
On Sun, February 19, 2006 05:10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I don't care what direction we go, just kill one.
Speaking for libpqxx, my only concern with that is the mailing list.
Would those have to move to different addresses--or conversely, would a
On Sun, February 19, 2006 05:10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I don't care what direction we go, just kill one.
Speaking for libpqxx, my only concern with that is the mailing list.
Would those have to move to different addresses--or conversely, would a
forced migration make it much easier to move *all
FYI - as a positive enhancement, Greenplum donated a beefy server to host
pgFoundry.
- Luke
On 2/18/06 10:34 AM, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
Dave Page wrote:
Moving CVS is not a problem - each project has their own repo on both systems.
The problem is moving all the database stuff such as the bug trackers and todo
lists, for which I'm told there are no working scripts.
The other one that caused me great pain when I moved psqlODBC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Joshua D. Drake
Sent: Sun 2/19/2006 12:35 AM
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Christopher Browne; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down
> This is not "get everything everyone want
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I've repeatedly asked for help moving my PL/Java stuff over to pgfoundry
and offered my help in the process, claiming that the CVS repository and
the mailing list are what really matters. I'd be fairly upset if gborg was
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I've repeatedly asked for help moving my PL/Java stuff over to
pgfoundry and offered my help in the process, claiming that the CVS
repository and the mailing list are what really matters. I'd be
fairly upset if gborg was shut down without that happening. FTP
archive
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
("Joshua D. Drake") transmitted:
>>>
>>> Slony-I would move there fairly quickly upon availability of SVN; a
>>> lot of our folks would be pretty keen on storing things in SVN.
>>> *That* is about the only thing holding off mi
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
have to conclude that any clean migration is never going to happen, so
let's just pick a server and announce date, and shut one of them off.
Just before shutt
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Slony-I would move there fairly quickly upon availability of SVN; a
lot of our folks would be pretty keen on storing things in SVN.
*That* is about the only thing holding off migration for at least one
project...
SVN is installed on the pgFoundry
Slony-I would move there fairly quickly upon availability of SVN; a
lot of our folks would be pretty keen on storing things in SVN.
*That* is about the only thing holding off migration for at least one
project...
SVN is installed on the pgFoundry server, but I think getting
pgFoundry to use
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Christopher Browne wrote:
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Dunstan)
would write:
If we could get to be running pgFoundry on the latest GForge, with
PHP/CGI enabled project web pages, a database per project available,
SVN as well as CVS, and
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
have to conclude that any clean migration is never going to happen, so
let's just pick a server and announce date, and
This is not "get everything everyone wants before shutting down a site"
time. We should move to one site, and if the new site is not to
someone's liking, there is always sourceforge and other hosting sites.
I do agree with Bruce here but... we need to make sure that
we give everyone their d
Christopher Browne wrote:
> Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Dunstan)
> would write:
> > If we could get to be running pgFoundry on the latest GForge, with
> > PHP/CGI enabled project web pages, a database per project available,
> > SVN as well as CVS, and a known
Christopher Browne wrote:
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Dunstan)
would write:
If we could get to be running pgFoundry on the latest GForge, with
PHP/CGI enabled project web pages, a database per project available,
SVN as well as CVS, and a known stable mai
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce
Momjian) wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> >> Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
>> >> have to conclude that any clean mi
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Dunstan)
would write:
> If we could get to be running pgFoundry on the latest GForge, with
> PHP/CGI enabled project web pages, a database per project available,
> SVN as well as CVS, and a known stable mailman release we'd be in
>
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> If we could get to be running pgFoundry on the latest GForge, with
> PHP/CGI enabled project web pages, a database per project available, SVN
> as well as CVS, and a known stable mailman release we'd be in excellent
> shape.
>
> I'd rather move forwards than back.
I don
Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
> >> have to conclude that any clean migration is never going to happen, so
> >> let's just pick a server and announce date, and shut on
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Indeed, we haven't made any particular effort to encourage gborg
projects to move. I think it's a bit premature to hold a gun to
their heads.
Well that is not exactly true. We have been encouraging gborg projects
to move for at least a year.
What we haven't done
Indeed, we haven't made any particular effort to encourage gborg
projects to move. I think it's a bit premature to hold a gun to
their heads.
Well that is not exactly true. We have been encouraging gborg projects
to move for at least a year.
What we haven't done is provided an easy means t
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:31:18AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
> have to conclude that any clean migration is never going to happen, so
> let's just pick a server and announce date, and shut one of them off.
Well, first you n
Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
>> have to conclude that any clean migration is never going to happen, so
>> let's just pick a server and announce date, and shut one of them off.
> I've rep
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
have to conclude that any clean migration is never going to happen, so
let's just pick a server and announce date, and shut one of them off.
Just before shutting it off, we should dump the existing projec
Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
have to conclude that any clean migration is never going to happen, so
let's just pick a server and announce date, and shut one of them off.
Just before shutting it off, we should dump the existing project
information to an FTP
32 matches
Mail list logo
